三、英文短篇寫作:請閱讀以下短文,並依指示寫作。文長必須在三百字以內。 Some scholars argue that criminal investigators do not need a high level of investigative skill, mainly because crimes of the future will be solved through scientists who will match DNA collected from crime scenes with DNA profiles of people held in custody whose details are stored on a huge database. This perspective may suggest that investigators will no longer be required to investigate; “science,” rather than investigative skill, will convict suspects. The advantages of this approach are huge: savings on staff and training and potentially a more scientifically and technologically consistent approach to crime investigation.
What is your response to the above-mentioned argument in favor of the scientific criminal investigation? Write a 300-word essay in English to elaborate on your response; examples from the criminal investigation in Taiwan are most welcome.