阿摩線上測驗 登入

111年 - 111 國立臺灣大學_轉學生招生考試:英文#127814

科目:研究所、轉學考(插大)、學士後-英文 | 年份:111年 | 選擇題數:49 | 申論題數:0

試卷資訊

所屬科目:研究所、轉學考(插大)、學士後-英文

選擇題 (49)

25.
(A) infiltrate. (B) interprete. (C) implore. (D) insinuate.
After the mass gun murders at Virginia Tech, I wrote about the unfathomable image of cell phones ringing in the pockets of the dead kids, and of the parents trying (26) to reach them. And I said (as did many others), This will go on, if no one stops it, in this manner and to this degree in this country alone—alone among all the industrialized, wealthy, and so-called (27) countries in the world. There would be another, for certain.

Then there were—many more, in fact—and when the latest and worst one happened, in Aurora, I (and many others) said, this time in a tone of despair, that nothing had changed. And I (and many others) predicted that it would happen again, soon. And that once again, the same twisted voices would say, Oh, this had nothing to do with gun laws or the misuse of the Second
(28) or anything except some singular madman, of whom America for some reason
seems to have a particularly dense sample.

And now it has happened again, bang, like clockwork, one might say: Twenty dead children—
babies, really—in a kindergarten in a prosperous town in Connecticut. And a mother screaming.
And twenty families told that their grade-schooler had died. After the Aurora killings, I did a few
debates with advocates for the child-killing lobby—sorry, the gun lobby—and, without
(29) and with a mad vehemence, they told the same old lies: it doesn't happen here
more often than elsewhere (yes, it does); more people are protected by guns than killed by them
(no, they aren't—that's a flat-out fabrication); guns don't kill people, people do; and all the other
perverted lies that people who can only be called knowing (30) to murder continue to
repeat, people who are in their own way every bit as twisted and crazy as the killers whom they
defend. (That they are often the same people who pretend outrage at the loss of a single
embryo only makes the craziness still crazier.)
30.
(A) accessories.
(B) accomodations.
(C) accentuations.
(D) accounts.
Reading Comprehension 40%
Read the passages and choose the best answer for each of the questions.
Every so often in "Top Gun: Maverick," Pete Mitchell (that's Maverick) is summoned to a face-
to-face with an admiral. Pete, after all these years in the Navy more than 35, but who's
counting - has stalled at the rank of captain. He's one of the best fighter pilots ever to take
wing, but the U.S. military hierarchy can be a treacherous political business, and Maverick is
anything but a politician. In the presence of a superior officer he is apt to salute, smirk and push
his career into the middle of the table like a stack of poker chips. He's all in. Always.
The first such meeting is with Rear Adm. Chester Cain, a weathered chunk of brass played by
Ed Harris, who has an impressive in-movie flight record of his own. (Without "The Right Stuff,"
there would have been no "Top Gun.") He seems to be telling Pete that the game is over.
Thanks to new technology, flyboys like him are all but obsolete.

Based on this scene, you might think that the movie is setting out to be a meditation on
American air power in the age of drone warfare, but that will have to wait for the next sequel.
Pete still has a job to do. A teaching job, officially, but we'll get to that. The conversation with
Cain is not so much a 35 herring as a meta-commentary. Pete, as I'm sure I don't have to
tell you, is the avatar of Tom Cruise, and the central question posed by this movie has less to do
with the necessity of combat pilots than with the relevance of movie stars. With all this cool new
technology at hand - you can binge 37 episodes of Silicon Valley grifting without leaving your
couch - do we really need guys, or movies, like this?
35. Choose the adjective that best fills the blank.
(A) yellow.
(B) blue.
(C) red.
(D) purple.
Aristotle thought that the value or worth of a human being — his virtue — was something that he acquired in growing up. It follows that people who can't (women, slaves) or simply don't (manual laborers) acquire that virtue have no grounds for demanding equal respect or recognition with those who do.

As I read him, Aristotle not only did not believe in the conception of intrinsic human dignity that grounds our modern commitment to human rights, he has a philosophy that cannot be squared with it. Aristotle's inegalitarianism is less like Kant and Hume's racism and more like Descartes's views on nonhuman animals: The fact that Descartes characterizes nonhuman animals as soulless automata is a direct consequence of his rationalist dualism. His comments on animals
cannot be treated as "stray remarks."

If cancellation is removal from a position of prominence on the basis of an ideological crime, it
might appear that there is a case to be made for canceling Aristotle. He has much prominence:
Thousands of years after his death, his ethical works continue to be taught as part of the basic
philosophy curriculum offered in colleges and universities around the world.

And Aristotle's mistake was serious enough that he comes off badly even when compared to the
various "bad guys" of history who sought to justify the exclusion of certain groups — women,
Black people, Jews, gays, atheists — from the sheltering umbrella of human dignity. Because
Aristotle went so far as to think there was no umbrella.
45. What is the alternative explanation about the findings?
(A) People like to put their money in real estate and sustenance.
(B) commercial activities are less common than previously thought.
(C) Pompeiians do not have the culture of carrying a large sum of money.
(D) All of the above.
Blockchain is a shared, immutable ledger that facilitates the process of recording transactions
and tracking assets in a business network. An asset can be tangible (a house, car, cash, land)
or intangible (intellectual property, patents, copyrights, branding). Virtually anything of value can
be tracked and traded on a blockchain network, reducing risk and cutting costs for all involved.

A simple analogy for understanding blockchain technology is a Google Doc. When we create a
document and share it with a group of people, the document is distributed instead of copied or
transferred. This creates a decentralized distribution chain that gives everyone access to the
document at the same time. No one is locked out awaiting changes from another party, while all
modifications to the doc are being recorded in real-time, making changes completely
transparent.

Why is blockchain important? Business runs on information. The faster it's received and the
more accurate it is, the better. Blockchain is ideal for delivering that information because it
provides immediate, shared and completely transparent information stored on an immutable
ledger that can be accessed only by permissioned network members. A blockchain network can
track orders, payments, accounts, production and much more. And because members share a
single view of the truth, you can see all details of a transaction end to end, giving you greater
confidence, as well as new efficiencies and opportunities.

申論題 (0)