7. Which of the following teaching techniques is NOT meaning-focused input?
(A) extensive reading
(B) intensive reading
(C) listening to stories
(D) skimming

答案：登入後查看
統計： A(63), B(127), C(25), D(98), E(0) #42870

詳解 (共 8 筆)

#35655

Extensive reading: reading for pleasure with emphasis on general understanding

只求了解文章,讀的速度比較快一點.



Intensive reading: reading carefully for an exact understanding of text. Necessary for contracts, legal documentation, application forms, etc.

很仔細讀每一個字,確定完全的了解,適用於讀合約.



Skimming: quickly looking through text to get an idea of what the text concerns. Used when reading magazines, newspaper articles etc.

快速的流覽過文章,只求知到文章大意.(如看報,看雜誌)

9
0
#22115


meaning-focused input並不是指重視平均度

是著重於意義理解的教法  而不是著重於形式的教法

form vs. meaning

intensive reading較注重language forms

7
0
#612450
intensive  精密的
extensive. 廣泛的，多方面的
2
0
#822665
這題是來此作怪的？intensive精密的, 才最能了解文章是什麼吧。the foremost meaning-focused input becomes the wrong answer :(
2
1
#22025
下列哪一個教學技巧，不是重視平均度的知識輸入

答案第二個

第二個是密集閱讀

第一個是廣泛閱讀
第三個是聽故事
第四個是游泳

四個選項都很不對題
1
0
#21955
Why?
1
0
#612625
Extensive reading: reading for pleasure with emphasis on general understanding 

只求了解文章,讀的速度比較快一點.
Intensive reading: reading carefully for an exact understanding of text. Necessary for contracts, legal documentation, application forms, etc. 

很仔細讀每一個字,確定完全的了解,適用於讀合約.
0
0
#25983
skimming略讀
0
0