According to the author, where could we more possibly see a 17-minute movie?
(A)On television.
(B)At an art house.
(C)On the Internet.
(D)At the multiplex.

據筆者，可以在那裡我們更可能看到一個17分鐘的電影？

(A)在電視上。

(B)在一個藝術之家

(C)在互聯網上。

(D)在多重

For some time now, it has been possible to imagine a moment when you will be able to watch whatever you want whenever you want in the setting of your choice.

The handful of websites that now offer streaming or downloadable feature films offer a glimpse看一看 of what is to come.

One of the intriguing非常有趣 promises these websites hold is a kind of virtual幾乎、虛擬 cinematheque实验电影院.

The retrieval取回 and preservation保護 of film history has been a project of many decades, accelerated and democratize使（國家或組織）民主化 by the rise of the DVD, which has put hundreds of old films in easy reach of the multitudes多數. 

Now, with the Internet that extends the promise of comprehensiveness and universal普遍 accessibility易接近, it is possible to expect that before too long the entire surviving history of movies will be open for browsing看, 流覽 and sampling at the click of a mouse for a few dollars.

Besides making the established home viewing habits a bit easier to indulge（使）沉溺, the on-line viewing experience also makes possible the rise of on-line video as a form of first-run distribution.

That is, as more and more movies that find their public not at the multiplex多放映廳電影院 or the art house, but at your house, the tyranny暴政 of feature films will erode侵蝕.

It is nearly impossible for a film that runs less than 70 minutes to be booked into a theater by itself, or for, say, a 17-minute movie to be given a block of television time.

But on-line screen time is more flexible and may thus reward報答；報償；酬謝 filmmakers for brevity簡短，簡潔 or at least economy of expression.