最新資料 | 阿摩線上測驗

最新科目

CRM 軟體應用(鼎新)(ACR)

ERP 軟體應用-配銷模組(鼎新)(EAD)

ERP 軟體應用-財務模組(鼎新)(EAF)

最新試卷

115年 - 20900 定向行動訓練單一工作項目 09：教學方法、策略及評估 51-71（2026/01/08 更新）#136558(21題)

115年 - 20900 定向行動訓練單一工作項目 09：教學方法、策略及評估 1-50（2026/01/08 更新）#136557(50題)

115年 - 20900 定向行動訓練單一工作項目 08：定向行動技能 1-57（2026/01/08 更新）#136556(57題)

115年 - 20900 定向行動訓練單一工作項目 07：定向行動輔具之認知與運作 1-41（2026/01/08 更新）#136555(41題)

115年 - 20900 定向行動訓練單一工作項目 06：視多障概論 1-34（2026/01/08 更新）#136554(34題)

115年 - 20900 定向行動訓練單一工作項目 05：定向行動概念發展 1-62（2026/01/08 更新）#136553(62題)

115年 - 20900 定向行動訓練單一工作項目 04：人類的成長與發展概論 1-39（2026/01/08 更新）#136552(39題)

115年 - 20900 定向行動訓練單一工作項目 03：視覺障礙者之心理-社會層面 1-36（2026/01/08 更新）#136551(36題)

115年 - 20900 定向行動訓練單一工作項目 02：感官知覺與動作發展 1-47（2026/01/08 更新）#136550(47題)

115年 - 20900 定向行動訓練單一工作項目 01：視覺系統及其功能之知識 1-58（2026/01/08 更新）#136549(58題)

最新試題

40.衛星定位測量之原理為(A)角度前方交會 (B)角度後方交會 (C)距離前方交會(D)距離後方交會。

39.GNSS全球導航定位系統除美國的GPS外，下列何者為非？(A)歐盟的GALILEO (B)日本的QZSS (C)中國大陸的BEIDOU (D)俄羅斯的GLONASS。

38.直接由GNSS測量之高程為(A)正高 (B)力高 (C)正常高 (D)椭球高。

最新申論題

4. 您認為鑄件產生氣孔之主要原因為何？

3. 試述機械造糢之優點。

2. 台灣鑄造產業未來發展趨勢為何？

最新課程

牙醫學(二)口腔病理學歷年考古題總整理

講師：D_exam_100

簡介：前言: 世上疾病如此多，準備考試的時間卻如此少。因此，我們需要用極有效率的方式來面對國考。自身經驗...

【警鴿心智圖】刑法分則-財產法益（四）

講師：小摩喵(課程：警鴿系列)

簡介：本課程以清晰的心智圖呈現複雜的法律概念，幫助你快速掌握核心要點！無論你是法律系學生、司法考試備考生，...

【警鴿心智圖】刑法分則-財產法益（五）

講師：小摩喵(課程：警鴿系列)

簡介：本課程以清晰的心智圖呈現複雜的法律概念，幫助你快速掌握核心要點！無論你是法律系學生、司法考試備考生，...

最新主題筆記

兒科

描述：內含疫苗注射統整及早產兒新生兒評估與健康問題

（國考）肺部位置與血流灌流

描述：國考重點內容螢光筆為考過的重點

（國考）連枷胸

描述：連枷胸對心肺的影響

最新討論

19. 閱讀下列對話，判斷(甲)、(乙)依序最適合填入的詞語為何？ (A) 椿萱並茂／鶯遷喬木 (B) 福壽全歸／鶯遷喬木 (C) 椿萱並茂／蓬蓽生輝 (D) 福壽全歸／蓬蓽生輝

25.關於書信，下列何者敘述正確？ (A) 用於對平輩的提稱語，可用：青鑒、青覽、如晤、如握、如面、收覽、知悉、知之。 (B) 用於對晚輩的結尾祝候語，可用：敬請教安、祗請道安、叩請絳安。 (C) 信封的寫作，在中路直式信封寫受信人姓名，稱對方為「○○○先生」時，「先生」二字要寫小或偏側。如稱對方的職銜，則名字通常寫在職銜之下，則職銜要寫小或偏右書寫，名字絕不可寫小或偏側。 (D) 信封的啟封詞要視受信人的身分來使用。如對親族長輩用「福啟」、「安啟」；用於一般長輩用「鈞啟」、「賜啟」；平輩用「臺啟」、「大啟」。

5 模板工程施工中有無收頭困難之處，係下列何項施工的要領中需說明檢討項目？ (A) 設計圖及施工說明書之檢討事項 (B) 施工作業說明書之編制內容 (C) 施工計畫內容 (D) 施工圖送審計畫

複選題II. Passage Completion (20%) Directions: For each blank in the passage, choose a sentence (A~H) that fits the context best. Passage 1 The recent controversy surrounding “Shy Girl,” a novel withdrawn by its publisher after readers detected signs of artificial intelligence involvement, has ignited a fierce debate about the future of literature. When large language models (LLMs) attempt creative writing, the resulting prose often oscillates between flat and lurid. It typically features excessive, clunky metaphors and verbless, staccato sentences. For literary purists, these stylistic glitches are symptomatic of a profound metaphysical void. (1) Without genuine experiences or emotions, they argue, a bot can never develop an authentic voice or bridge the gap between human minds. However, the assumption that human creation is inherently superior overlooks an uncomfortable truth. (2) If we compare an LLM’s output to a masterpiece by Vladimir Nabokov, the machine’s text inevitably appears wooden. Yet, when pitted against a generic airport thriller, AI-generated prose can seem remarkably competent. Furthermore, the publishing industry often thrives on derivative content, marketing new books as mere hybrids of previous bestsellers. The case of “Shy Girl” perfectly illustrates this blurred line. Despite the ensuing scandal, online reviews indicate that many readers genuinely enjoyed the book. (3) In fact, some genre novelists are already openly utilizing bots to bypass the grunt work of writing, inputting established tropes to generate content. As these models rapidly improve, we may soon see a market where readers request highly customized fiction tailored to their exact preferences. Meanwhile, the ethical and legal battles are just beginning. Writers are justifiably aggrieved that their original works were ingested without consent to train their soulless competitors. (4) To protect human authors, some publishers are banking on certification schemes to guarantee that a book was written by an organic human being. However, as AI tools become ubiquitous in research and editing, this binary categorization may eventually collapse. Ultimately, the question is not merely whether a brilliant human writer can outperform a machine. The truly salient issue is an economic one. (5) The moral of this literary controversy is not that AI writing should be outright banned; rather, human authors must find a way to commercially and artistically outcompete it. (AB) Even if human genius remains unmatched, it is uncertain whether enough readers will pay a premium to sustain the traditional publishing industry. (AC) Because AI lacks a soul, it is fundamentally incapable of the fraught exercise of freedom that defines true art. (AD) Consequently, class-action lawsuits are currently underway to demand compensation for this omnivorous form of plagiarism. (AE) Although the accused author ultimately confessed to utilizing algorithms, she maintained that the software merely assisted with minor grammatical corrections. (BC) The reality is that a significant portion of human-authored commercial fiction is itself highly formulaic and lacking in originality. (BD) Furthermore, historical evidence suggests that every major technological disruption initially faces fierce, yet ultimately futile, resistance from traditionalists. (BE) This phenomenon suggests that a substantial segment of the reading public remains completely unfazed by undeclared machine involvement. (CD) To combat this trend, literary agencies have collectively agreed to boycott any manuscripts suspected of lacking organic human authorship. 1.

複選題2.

複選題3.