最新資料

公共行政

防制洗錢與打擊資恐法令及實務1

人力資源管理 ( 含勞動法規及教育訓練 )

115年 - 115-1 專技高考_醫師(二)：醫學(五)（包括外科、骨科、泌尿科等科目及其相關臨床實例與醫學倫理）#137338(80題)

115年 - 115-1 專技高考_牙醫師(二)：牙醫學(六)（包括齒顎矯正學、兒童牙科學、牙科公共衛生學等科目及其相關臨床實例與醫學倫理）#137337(80題)

115年 - 115-1 專技高考_醫師(二)：醫學(四)（包括小兒科、皮膚科、神經科、精神科等科目及其相關臨床實例與醫學倫理）#137336(80題)

115年 - 115-1 專技高考_醫事放射師：核子醫學診療原理與技術學#137335(80題)

115年 - 115-1 專技高考_醫師(二)：醫學(六)（包括麻醉科、眼科、耳鼻喉科、婦產科、復健科等科目及其相關臨床實例與醫學倫理）#137334(80題)

115年 - 115-1 專技高考_物理治療師：物理治療基礎學（包括解剖學、生理學、肌動學與生物力學）#137333(80題)

115年 - 115-1 專技高考_醫事放射師：基礎醫學（包括解剖學、生理學與病理學）#137332(80題)

115年 - 115-1 專技高考_物理治療師：物理治療技術學（包括電療學、熱療學、操作治療學與輔具學）#137331(80題)

115年 - 115-1 專技高考_物理治療師：骨科疾病物理治療學#137330(80題)

115年 - 115-1 專技高考_醫師(一)：醫學（一）（包括生物化學、解剖學、胚胎及發育生物學、組織學、生理學等科目知識及其臨床之應用）#137329(100題)

40.衛星定位測量之原理為(A)角度前方交會 (B)角度後方交會 (C)距離前方交會(D)距離後方 交會。

39.GNSS全球導航定位系統除美國的GPS外，下列何者為非？(A)歐盟的GALILEO (B)日本的QZSS (C)中國大陸的BEIDOU (D)俄羅斯的GLONASS。

38.直接由GNSS測量之高程為(A)正高 (B)力高 (C)正常高 (D)椭球高。

4. 您認為鑄件產生氣孔之主要原因為何？

3. 試述機械造糢之優點。

2. 台灣鑄造產業未來發展趨勢為何？

警察法規(下)

講師：衝啊！

簡介：本課程將帶您逐一分析重要法條、考點，將易混淆的觀點整理清楚 並透過歷屆試題及其他題目幫您將觀念更加鞏...

藥師一階國考 藥物化學考題 分章節國考歷屆試題

講師：菜餅

簡介：分章節的藥物化學國考題，考試科目：藥師國考一階。

藥師二階國考 藥事行政與法規 分章節國考歷屆試題

講師：菜餅

簡介：分章節的藥事行政與法規練習題。 參考考選部公告之命題大綱，分章節的藥劑學練習題，藥學系準備藥師國考二...

自由落體和鉛直上拋

課程：國營物理
章節：運動學

平面向量和平面運動

課程：國營物理
章節：運動學

拋體運動(平拋和斜拋)

課程：國營物理
章節：運動學

19. 閱讀下列對話，判斷(甲)、(乙)依序最適合填入的詞語為何？ (A) 椿萱並茂／鶯遷喬木 (B) 福壽全歸／鶯遷喬木 (C) 椿萱並茂／蓬蓽生輝 (D) 福壽全歸／蓬蓽生輝

25.關於書信，下列何者敘述正確？ (A) 用於對平輩的提稱語，可用：青鑒、青覽、如晤、如握、如面、收覽、知悉、知之。 (B) 用於對晚輩的結尾祝候語，可用：敬請 教安、祗請 道安、叩請 絳安。 (C) 信封的寫作，在中路直式信封寫受信人姓名，稱對方為「○○○先生」時，「先生」二字要寫小或偏側。如稱對方的職銜，則名 字通常寫在職銜之下，則職銜要寫小或偏右書寫，名字絕不可寫小或偏側。 (D) 信封的啟封詞要視受信人的身分來使用。如對親族長輩用「福啟」、「安啟」；用於一般長輩用「鈞啟」、「賜啟」；平輩用「臺 啟」、「大啟」。

5 模板工程施工中有無收頭困難之處，係下列何項施工的要領中需說明檢討項目？ (A) 設計圖及施工說明書之檢討事項 (B) 施工作業說明書之編制內容 (C) 施工計畫內容 (D) 施工圖送審計畫

複選題II. Passage Completion (20%) Directions: For each blank in the passage, choose a sentence (A~H) that fits the context best. Passage 1 The recent controversy surrounding “Shy Girl,” a novel withdrawn by its publisher after readers detected signs of artificial intelligence involvement, has ignited a fierce debate about the future of literature. When large language models (LLMs) attempt creative writing, the resulting prose often oscillates between flat and lurid. It typically features excessive, clunky metaphors and verbless, staccato sentences. For literary purists, these stylistic glitches are symptomatic of a profound metaphysical void. __ (1) __ Without genuine experiences or emotions, they argue, a bot can never develop an authentic voice or bridge the gap between human minds. However, the assumption that human creation is inherently superior overlooks an uncomfortable truth. __ (2) __ If we compare an LLM’s output to a masterpiece by Vladimir Nabokov, the machine’s text inevitably appears wooden. Yet, when pitted against a generic airport thriller, AI-generated prose can seem remarkably competent. Furthermore, the publishing industry often thrives on derivative content, marketing new books as mere hybrids of previous bestsellers. The case of “Shy Girl” perfectly illustrates this blurred line. Despite the ensuing scandal, online reviews indicate that many readers genuinely enjoyed the book. __ (3) __ In fact, some genre novelists are already openly utilizing bots to bypass the grunt work of writing, inputting established tropes to generate content. As these models rapidly improve, we may soon see a market where readers request highly customized fiction tailored to their exact preferences. Meanwhile, the ethical and legal battles are just beginning. Writers are justifiably aggrieved that their original works were ingested without consent to train their soulless competitors. __ (4) __ To protect human authors, some publishers are banking on certification schemes to guarantee that a book was written by an organic human being. However, as AI tools become ubiquitous in research and editing, this binary categorization may eventually collapse. Ultimately, the question is not merely whether a brilliant human writer can outperform a machine. The truly salient issue is an economic one. __ (5) __ The moral of this literary controversy is not that AI writing should be outright banned; rather, human authors must find a way to commercially and artistically outcompete it. (AB) Even if human genius remains unmatched, it is uncertain whether enough readers will pay a premium to sustain the traditional publishing industry. (AC) Because AI lacks a soul, it is fundamentally incapable of the fraught exercise of freedom that defines true art. (AD) Consequently, class-action lawsuits are currently underway to demand compensation for this omnivorous form of plagiarism. (AE) Although the accused author ultimately confessed to utilizing algorithms, she maintained that the software merely assisted with minor grammatical corrections. (BC) The reality is that a significant portion of human-authored commercial fiction is itself highly formulaic and lacking in originality. (BD) Furthermore, historical evidence suggests that every major technological disruption initially faces fierce, yet ultimately futile, resistance from traditionalists. (BE) This phenomenon suggests that a substantial segment of the reading public remains completely unfazed by undeclared machine involvement. (CD) To combat this trend, literary agencies have collectively agreed to boycott any manuscripts suspected of lacking organic human authorship. 1.

複選題2.

複選題3.(AB) Even if human genius remains unmatched, it is uncertain whether enough readers will pay a premium to sustain the traditional publishing industry. (AC) Because AI lacks a soul, it is fundamentally incapable of the fraught exercise of freedom that defines true art. (AD) Consequently, class-action lawsuits are currently underway to demand compensation for this omnivorous form of plagiarism. (AE) Although the accused author ultimately confessed to utilizing algorithms, she maintained that the software merely assisted with minor grammatical corrections. (BC) The reality is that a significant portion of human-authored commercial fiction is itself highly formulaic and lacking in originality. (BD) Furthermore, historical evidence suggests that every major technological disruption initially faces fierce, yet ultimately futile, resistance from traditionalists. (BE) This phenomenon suggests that a substantial segment of the reading public remains completely unfazed by undeclared machine involvement. (CD) To combat this trend, literary agencies have collectively agreed to boycott any manuscripts suspected of lacking organic human authorship.