最新資料

警察◆三等◆消防與災害防救法規

一般警察/警察◆四等◆消防與災害防救法規概要(112年前)

公民與(世界、中外)本國史地大意

115年 - 115-1 臺北市立松山家商_教師甄選初試試題(術科)_廣告設計科：電腦繪圖#138797(1題)

115年 - 114 國營臺灣鐵路股份有限公司_從業人員甄試_第10、11階：共同科目-作文#138796(1題)

115年 - 115-1 臺北市立士林高級商業職業學校_正式教師甄選試題：商業經營科#138795(15題)

115年 - 115 桃園市立中壢商業高級中等學校_教師甄選試題：多媒體設計科#138794(23題)

115年 - 115 桃園市立陽明高中_教師甄選試題：全民國防教育科#138792(10題)

115年 - 115 桃園市立陽明高中_教師甄選試題：公民與社會科#138788(13題)

115年 - 115-1 國立頭城高級家事商業職業學校_教師甄選試題：餐飲管理科#138786(38題)

115年 - 115-1 國立頭城高級家事商業職業學校_教師甄選試題：資料處理科#138785(29題)

115年 - 115-1 國立竹東高級中學_教師甄試試題：會計事務科#138784(20題)

115年 - 115-1 國立竹東高級中學_教師甄試試題：國文科#138782(7題)

40.衛星定位測量之原理為(A)角度前方交會 (B)角度後方交會 (C)距離前方交會(D)距離後方 交會。

39.GNSS全球導航定位系統除美國的GPS外，下列何者為非？(A)歐盟的GALILEO (B)日本的QZSS (C)中國大陸的BEIDOU (D)俄羅斯的GLONASS。

38.直接由GNSS測量之高程為(A)正高 (B)力高 (C)正常高 (D)椭球高。

4. 您認為鑄件產生氣孔之主要原因為何？

3. 試述機械造糢之優點。

2. 台灣鑄造產業未來發展趨勢為何？

國二數學上數學課程（八年級）

講師：台中大雅家教-睿智數學及英文家教，王瑞志老師

簡介：八年級數學課程，老師口訣秒殺解題！

【警鴿】刑事訴訟法(上)

講師：小摩喵(課程：警鴿系列)

簡介：深入淺出，帶您了解刑事訴訟法 從刑事訴訟法之基本概念、偵查、起訴，帶您快速瀏覽學說及實務重要觀念

考衝班-國中會考，考前衝刺班!

講師：台中大雅家教-睿智數學及英文家教，王瑞志老師

簡介：提供112年、111年、110年...等各年度的國中會考考畢英文影音解答、解析......等。 #國中會考 #單字 #片語 #...

警察處理動物保護法案件作業程序

課程：【警鴿】警察情境實務(完整收錄歷年特考題、附SOP)(上)
章節：【必考類別】行政類

執行管束作業程序

課程：【警鴿】警察情境實務(完整收錄歷年特考題、附SOP)(上)
章節：【必考類別】行政類

警察機關處理醫療院所滋擾及暴力案件作業程序

課程：【警鴿】警察情境實務(完整收錄歷年特考題、附SOP)(上)
章節：【必考類別】行政類

19. 閱讀下列對話，判斷(甲)、(乙)依序最適合填入的詞語為何？ (A) 椿萱並茂／鶯遷喬木 (B) 福壽全歸／鶯遷喬木 (C) 椿萱並茂／蓬蓽生輝 (D) 福壽全歸／蓬蓽生輝

25.關於書信，下列何者敘述正確？ (A) 用於對平輩的提稱語，可用：青鑒、青覽、如晤、如握、如面、收覽、知悉、知之。 (B) 用於對晚輩的結尾祝候語，可用：敬請 教安、祗請 道安、叩請 絳安。 (C) 信封的寫作，在中路直式信封寫受信人姓名，稱對方為「○○○先生」時，「先生」二字要寫小或偏側。如稱對方的職銜，則名 字通常寫在職銜之下，則職銜要寫小或偏右書寫，名字絕不可寫小或偏側。 (D) 信封的啟封詞要視受信人的身分來使用。如對親族長輩用「福啟」、「安啟」；用於一般長輩用「鈞啟」、「賜啟」；平輩用「臺 啟」、「大啟」。

5 模板工程施工中有無收頭困難之處，係下列何項施工的要領中需說明檢討項目？ (A) 設計圖及施工說明書之檢討事項 (B) 施工作業說明書之編制內容 (C) 施工計畫內容 (D) 施工圖送審計畫

複選題II. Passage Completion (20%) Directions: For each blank in the passage, choose a sentence (A~H) that fits the context best. Passage 1 The recent controversy surrounding “Shy Girl,” a novel withdrawn by its publisher after readers detected signs of artificial intelligence involvement, has ignited a fierce debate about the future of literature. When large language models (LLMs) attempt creative writing, the resulting prose often oscillates between flat and lurid. It typically features excessive, clunky metaphors and verbless, staccato sentences. For literary purists, these stylistic glitches are symptomatic of a profound metaphysical void. __ (1) __ Without genuine experiences or emotions, they argue, a bot can never develop an authentic voice or bridge the gap between human minds. However, the assumption that human creation is inherently superior overlooks an uncomfortable truth. __ (2) __ If we compare an LLM’s output to a masterpiece by Vladimir Nabokov, the machine’s text inevitably appears wooden. Yet, when pitted against a generic airport thriller, AI-generated prose can seem remarkably competent. Furthermore, the publishing industry often thrives on derivative content, marketing new books as mere hybrids of previous bestsellers. The case of “Shy Girl” perfectly illustrates this blurred line. Despite the ensuing scandal, online reviews indicate that many readers genuinely enjoyed the book. __ (3) __ In fact, some genre novelists are already openly utilizing bots to bypass the grunt work of writing, inputting established tropes to generate content. As these models rapidly improve, we may soon see a market where readers request highly customized fiction tailored to their exact preferences. Meanwhile, the ethical and legal battles are just beginning. Writers are justifiably aggrieved that their original works were ingested without consent to train their soulless competitors. __ (4) __ To protect human authors, some publishers are banking on certification schemes to guarantee that a book was written by an organic human being. However, as AI tools become ubiquitous in research and editing, this binary categorization may eventually collapse. Ultimately, the question is not merely whether a brilliant human writer can outperform a machine. The truly salient issue is an economic one. __ (5) __ The moral of this literary controversy is not that AI writing should be outright banned; rather, human authors must find a way to commercially and artistically outcompete it. (AB) Even if human genius remains unmatched, it is uncertain whether enough readers will pay a premium to sustain the traditional publishing industry. (AC) Because AI lacks a soul, it is fundamentally incapable of the fraught exercise of freedom that defines true art. (AD) Consequently, class-action lawsuits are currently underway to demand compensation for this omnivorous form of plagiarism. (AE) Although the accused author ultimately confessed to utilizing algorithms, she maintained that the software merely assisted with minor grammatical corrections. (BC) The reality is that a significant portion of human-authored commercial fiction is itself highly formulaic and lacking in originality. (BD) Furthermore, historical evidence suggests that every major technological disruption initially faces fierce, yet ultimately futile, resistance from traditionalists. (BE) This phenomenon suggests that a substantial segment of the reading public remains completely unfazed by undeclared machine involvement. (CD) To combat this trend, literary agencies have collectively agreed to boycott any manuscripts suspected of lacking organic human authorship. 1.

複選題2.(AB) Even if human genius remains unmatched, it is uncertain whether enough readers will pay a premium to sustain the traditional publishing industry. (AC) Because AI lacks a soul, it is fundamentally incapable of the fraught exercise of freedom that defines true art. (AD) Consequently, class-action lawsuits are currently underway to demand compensation for this omnivorous form of plagiarism. (AE) Although the accused author ultimately confessed to utilizing algorithms, she maintained that the software merely assisted with minor grammatical corrections. (BC) The reality is that a significant portion of human-authored commercial fiction is itself highly formulaic and lacking in originality. (BD) Furthermore, historical evidence suggests that every major technological disruption initially faces fierce, yet ultimately futile, resistance from traditionalists. (BE) This phenomenon suggests that a substantial segment of the reading public remains completely unfazed by undeclared machine involvement. (CD) To combat this trend, literary agencies have collectively agreed to boycott any manuscripts suspected of lacking organic human authorship.

複選題3.