最新資料

船體檢驗（包括1船級2電銲3建造時之檢驗4載重線勘劃5海上人命安全國際公約6噸位丈量7繫船及起貨設備8現成船特別、定期及臨時檢驗9國際海上避碰規則10防止船舶污染國際公約等）

輪機檢驗(包括1材料檢驗2鍋爐及壓力容器3主機4輔機5軸系及推進器6泵、閥及管路7通風及冷藏8試?試航9污染管制等)

專技◆驗船師◆專業英文

115年 - [無官方正解]115 國立臺灣大學_ 碩士班招生考試試題：生態學(A)#137646(40題)

115年 - [無官方正解]115 國立臺灣大學_ 碩士班招生考試試題：細胞與分子生物學#137645(40題)

115年 - [無官方正解]115 國立臺灣大學_ 碩士班招生考試試題：分子與細胞生物學#137644(24題)

115年 - [無官方正解]115 國立臺灣大學_ 碩士班招生考試試題：生物化學(C)#137643(39題)

115年 - 115 新北市政府環境保護局_儲備清潔隊員甄試試題題庫：廉政及職業安全衛生類 51-100#137642(50題)

115年 - [無官方正解]115 國立臺灣大學_ 碩士班招生考試試題：生物化學(A)#137641(50題)

115年 - 115 新北市政府環境保護局_儲備清潔隊員甄試試題題庫：環保常識類 801-843#137640(43題)

115年 - [無官方正解]115 國立臺灣大學_ 碩士班招生考試試題：生化學#137639(28題)

115年 - 115 新北市政府環境保護局_儲備清潔隊員甄試試題題庫：環保常識類 751-800#137637(50題)

115年 - 115 新北市政府環境保護局_儲備清潔隊員甄試試題題庫：環保常識類 701-750#137636(50題)

50. A teacher follows a sequence of "I Do (Modeling), We Do (Guided Practice), You Do (Independent Practice)" to help students master a new sentence pattern. This technique is primarily referred to as: (A) Scaffolding (B) Rote Learning (C) Inductive Discovery (D) Peer Correction

49. During a lesson, a teacher uses "Exit Slips" to check student understanding. She uses this data to modify her teaching plan for the next day. This is an example of: (A) Summative Assessment (B) Placement Assessment (C) Formative Assessment (D) Diagnostic Assessment

48. A teacher provides "i + 1" input—language that is just slightly beyond the students' current level of competence—to ensure they are challenged but not overwhelmed. This aligns with which of Krashen's hypotheses? (A) The Affective Filter Hypothesis (B) The Natural Order Hypothesis (C) The Input Hypothesis (D) The Monitor Hypothesis

IV. Design a worksheet for the following passage. Before your design, please specify your teaching foci and expected learning outcomes in 100 words.            There's a myth that to be a good leader, you need to be the smartest person in the room. As a result, many leaders struggle to admit that they don't have all the answers. They're reluctant to ask for help and end up struggling in silence. This reluctance is normal—it's a fear-based response to not wanting to look incompetent to your team or superiors. But there is a way you can ask for help that strengthens your position as a leader, rather than undermines it.           Reluctance to ask for help isn't just pride: it's often about perception. And this concern isn't entirely unfounded. One study found that male leaders risked being perceived as less competent when they asked for a lot of help. In contrast, their female counterparts in the same study didn't experience a significant drop in perceived competence when seeking help.           However, researchers cautioned that it isn't actually whether or not you ask for help, but how you ask. The same study noted that asking for help is critical for leaders to learn and improve. And the benefits of asking for help far outweigh the perceived risks. Harvard Business School researchers Alison Wood Brooks and Francesca Gino found that our mindset around seeking guidance is misguided. We might think that others will see us as less capable, but the opposite is true. In their study, Brooks and Gino found that when we ask others for advice, they view us as more competent. It signals that we value their expertise and don't overestimate ourselves, which is a sign of self-awareness. Moving beyond perceptions, asking for help is also likely to yield better performance results. By utilizing the knowledge, expertise, and insight of your team, you expand your collective problem-solving capacity. Leveraging people's strengths to solve complex problems is the hallmark of a competent leader.           There's a term for what effective leaders do when they admit they don't know everything: strategic vulnerability. Rather than appearing inept or oversharing indiscriminately, asking questions positions you to lead through vulnerability. That's because you demonstrate that it has a purpose, which is to empower others, utilize their expertise, build trust, and spark collective solutions.           Harvard Professor Amy Edmondson, a leading expert on psychological safety, says the simple admission of "I might miss something here, I need to hear from you" lays a foundation of a psychologically safe environment. By modeling fallibility—not ineptitude, you create an environment where people feel safe to speak up, ask questions, and share their opinions and ideas. These are all the fundamental elements of a high-performing team.           As Edmondson highlights in her research, an environment with high levels of psychological safety is one with fewer mistakes, less duplication, and less fear and anxiety. When you ask questions as a leader, you appear accessible and approachable. This creates the space for others to do the same, fast-tracking the discovery and recovery from mistakes or potentially more fatal decisions.           As a leader, you set the tone: what you do becomes the behaviors that you accept, which your team then reinforces. Asking questions models curiosity and humility. When people feel like you value their input, they can see how their contributions matter to the bigger picture. This builds trust, loyalty, and a sense of meaningfulness into the everyday functions of work. Strategic vulnerability—when you do it right—flips the script from looking incompetent to empowering your team. It also beats pretending you have all the answers.

III. Based on the prompt below, write a model essay in 250 words (10%), and design a lesson plan for a 4-period writing class (15%). Your lesson plan should include the rationale, objectives, materials, teaching procedures, and assessment methods. 提示：近年來養寵物的風氣在臺灣日漸普遍，而寵物在人們生活中的角色也與過去不同。請以此為主題，並參照下列圖片，寫一篇英文作文，文分兩段。第一段描述這些圖片中所呈現的現象；第二段則根據你自身的經驗或觀察，說明此現象的原因以及可能的影響。

II. Design FIVE integrated reading questions for the new General Scholastic Ability Test (新型學測混合題型). Include at least three different types (e.g., multiple-choice, matching, table completion, short-answer, true/false, blank-filling). The article doesn't need to be rewritten. Provide the correct answer for each question. (25%)          The increasingly early blooming of cherry blossoms has become a striking and observable sign of climate change. Drawing on a remarkable 1,200-year record from Kyoto, scientists have found that the timing of cherry blossom blooms has shifted significantly—now occurring nearly two weeks earlier than in the mid-19th century. This extensive historical dataset provides strong evidence that today's climate conditions are unlike anything previously experienced, surpassing earlier fluctuations such as the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age.          This shift is largely driven by global warming, which is primarily caused by human activities such as the combustion of fossil fuels. Rising temperatures have accelerated the arrival of spring, leading to earlier flowering not only in Kyoto but also in other regions, including Washington, D.C. Although scientists in the United States have identified a consistent trend toward earlier blooming, they have not yet conclusively attributed it to human-induced climate change, partly because other factors, such as the urban heat island effect, may also play a role. In contrast, Kyoto's long-term records enable researchers to directly connect earlier bloom dates to anthropogenic climate change.          Recent data further corroborates this pattern. Kyoto experienced record-breaking early blooms in 2020, 2021, and 2023, and research indicates that climate change has already advanced peak bloom timing by approximately 11 days. Under moderate emissions scenarios, projections suggest that blossoms could appear nearly another week earlier by the end of the century.          These changes are not merely visual; they carry serious ecological implications. Earlier blooming may disrupt the synchronization between flowers and their pollinators, while also increasing the risk of damage from unexpected late frosts. The consequences extend beyond ornamental trees. Fruit-bearing species such as apples and peaches face similar challenges, particularly if warmer winters fail to provide the cold conditions necessary for proper dormancy. Without sufficient chilling periods, some trees may not flower at all, posing risks to agricultural production.         At the same time, cherry blossoms continue to hold both scientific and cultural importance. They serve as valuable indicators for tracking environmental change while also symbolizing renewal and seasonal transition. However, their increasingly early appearance underscores the urgency of reducing carbon emissions to mitigate the most severe consequences of climate change.

【社工師考試】社會工作研究方法｜考試重點｜答題技巧

講師：社工師考試｜考試重點｜答題技巧

簡介：｜社工師考試榜眼 ｜現職司法領域工作者 ｜臺大法律系及社工系雙主修畢業 ｜如何使用這份筆記？ 　　這份筆...

調劑學_歷屆國考題整理

講師：小笨蛋

簡介：本課程適合藥師第二階段考試 整理範圍：112-1~113-2專技高考-調劑學與臨床藥學 僅題目分章節整理，詳解請另...

藥物治療學_歷屆國考考題整理

講師：小笨蛋

簡介：本課程適合藥師第二階段考試 整理範圍：111-1~113-2專技高考-調劑學與臨床藥學 僅題目分章節整理，詳解請另...

運動心理學三碼模式

課程：徐喬-經濟學(資料太多優化中)
章節：Ch12.寡占市場

市場之區分

課程：徐喬-經濟學(資料太多優化中)
章節：Ch12.寡占市場

獨占

課程：徐喬-經濟學(資料太多優化中)
章節：Ch13.獨占性競爭

44 拌和廠之設備及操作應做定期檢查，出車 裝料淨重與各盤重量總和值之最大容許誤 差範圍為: (A) ±1% (B) ±2% (C) ±3% (D) ±4%

18.張老師在教導學生運用AI設計廣告圖像時，不斷強調應注意主題、情境、圖像等的獨特性或顯著性，才能創造廣告的最高價值。張老師的教學突顯了什麼現象？(A)初始效應(B)萊斯托夫效應(C)編碼特定原則(D)自我應驗預言

8. 我國教育行政在實務執行上是偏向何種類型？(A)地方分權(B)中央集權(C)均權制度(D)民主制度。

9. 李老師是國中八年級的英文教師，邀請國文及美術教師，根據各自領域或學科的學習重點及特性，並考量學校教育願景及校訂核心能力，共同修改「拒絕污染你我他」的課程架構及課程內涵，則這群教師所修訂的課程精神，較符合哪一課程設計因素的考量？(A)範圍性(B)繼續性(C)順序性(D)統整性。

15. 當電路諧振時，諧振頻率 f0及品質因數Q分別約為何？ (A)f0=15.9Hz、Q=10 (B)f0=15.9Hz、Q=1 (C)f0=100Hz、Q=10 (D)f0=100Hz、Q=1

16. 當電路諧振時，電源電流is(t) 之有效值為何？ (A)1 A (B)2 A (C)3 A (D)4 A