25. DDT was once considered a "silver bullet" that would permanently eradicate insect pests. Today, instead, DDT is largely useless against many insects. Which of these would have been required for this pest eradication effort to be successful in the long run?
(A) The frequency of DDT application should have been higher.
(B) None of the individual insects should have possessed genomes that made them resistant to DDT.
(C) DDT application should have been continual.
(D) All habitats should have received applications of DDT at about the same time.
(E) Larger doses of DDT should have been applied.

答案:登入後查看
統計: A(2), B(40), C(4), D(14), E(1) #1126292

詳解 (共 2 筆)

#4624897
All individual insec...
(共 279 字,隱藏中)
前往觀看
3
0
#6496771

(A) 提高使用頻率:這反而會加速抗藥性昆蟲的存活與繁殖,不是解決方式。

(B) ✅ 正確答案
若昆蟲基因中沒有抗DDT的基因,那麼DDT的效果才可能長期有效。這是一個理想但不現實的情況(因為總會有變異),題目問「必要條件」,這個答案最符合自然選擇與抗藥性形成的根本機制。

(C) 持續使用:一樣會加快抗藥性個體的自然選擇過程。

(D) 同時施用:可減少躲避施藥的昆蟲,但無法解決抗藥性的出現。

(E) 增加劑量:同樣會強化選擇壓力,導致抗藥性更快形成。

1
0