阿摩線上測驗
登入
首頁
>
研究所、轉學考(插大)、學士後-行政學
>
110年 - 110 國立政治大學_碩士班招生考試_公共行政學系:行政學#102923
> 申論題
題組內容
三、解釋名詞(24%)
2. Motivation-hygiene theory
相關申論題
一、英文題(25%) 請用中文作答,勿逐句翻譯,勿抄原文。 Please (1) summarize the material (15%) and (2) explain why Lipsky argues that "street-level bureaucrats implicitly mediate aspects of the constitutional relationship of citizens to the state". (10%) Public service workers currently occupy a critical position in American society. Although they are not normally regarded as low-level employees, the actions of most public service workers actually constitute the services "delivered" by government. Moreover, when taken together the individual decisions of these workers becomes, or add up to, agency policy. Whether government policy is to deliver "goods"-such as welfare or public housing-or to confer status--such as "criminal" or "mentally ill"--the discretionary actions of public employees are the benefits and sanctions of government programs or determine access to government rights and benefits. Most citizens encounter government (if they encounter it at all) not through letters to congressmen or by attendance at schoo! board meetings but through their teachers and their children's teachers and through the policeman on the corner or in the patrol car. Each encounter of this kind represents an instance of policy delivery. Public service workers who interact directly with citizens in the course of their jobs, and who have substantial discretion in the execution of their work are called street-level bureaucrats in this study. Public service agencies that employ a significant number of street level bureaucrats in proportion to their work force are called street-level bureaucracies. Typical strect-level bureaucrats are teachers, police oficers and other law enforcement personnel, social workers, judges, public lawyers and other court officers, health workers, and many other public employees who grant access to government programs and provide services within them. People who work in these jobs tend to have much in common because they experience analytically similar work conditions. Street-level bureaucrats dominate political controversies over public services for two general reasons. First, debates about the proper scope and focus of governmental services are essentially debates over the scope and function of these public employees. Second, street-level bureaucrats have considerable impact on people's lives. This impact may be of several kinds. They socialize citizens to expectations of government services and a place in the political community. They determine the eligibility of citizens for government benefits and sanctions. They oversee the treatment (the service) citizens receive in those programs. Thus, in a sense street-level bureaucrats implicitly mediate aspects of the constitutional relationsbip of citizens to the state. In short, they hold the keys to a dimension of citizenship. Reference:節錄自Lipsky,M.(1980).Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services (pp.1-2). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
#434312
二、申論題(25%) 1.臺北市政府於2020年12月,宣布成立跨局單位的府級「資料治理委員」,該委員會成立之目的在 完善市府的資料治理框架及機制。請闡釋「資料治理」(datav的意涵與要素,進一步論述公部門在推動資料治理時可能面臨哪些挑戰,並嘗試針對這些挑戰提出可能的解決方法。
#434313
1. Bounded rationality
#434314
3. Negative entropy
#434316
4. Organized anarchy
#434317
(一)何謂典範?
#434318
(二)典範發展的過程 為何?
#434319
(三)請從近年來我國政府的運作中,試舉一例說明典範移轉(paradigm shift)的現象。
#434320
四、你知道政府目前有哪些電子化政府的相關作為?你是否同意我國政府應該走向開放政府(open government)舆資訊透明化(transparency),為什麼?政府採行電子治理應注意哪些問題?(25分)
#419668
三、行政院人事行政總處擬將三級機關首長之任用改為政務與常務雙軌制。請問改制之後相較於原本的 制度可能會有哪些利弊得失?你覺得相關制度與其優缺,可能與行政學的那些理論學說相關?該理論學說內涵為何?試申論之。(25分)
#419667
相關試卷
110年 - 110 國立政治大學_碩士班招生考試_公共行政學系:行政學#102923
110年 · #102923
110年 - 110 國立臺灣大學_碩士班招生考試_公共事務研究所:行政學#100289
110年 · #100289
105年 - 105 年 - 105 淡江大學 轉學考 行政學#61915
105年 · #61915
104年 - 104 淡江大學 轉學考 行政學#52972
104年 · #52972
103年 - 淡江大學 轉學考 行政學#52978
103年 · #52978
102年 - 淡江大學 轉學考 行政學#52970
102年 · #52970
101年 - 淡江大學 轉學考 行政學#53236
101年 · #53236
100年 - 淡江大學 轉學考 行政學#55511
100年 · #55511
99年 - 淡江大學 轉學考 行政學#55476
99年 · #55476
98年 - 淡江大學 轉學考 行政學#55509
98年 · #55509