105年 - 105 外交特種考試_三等_外交領事人員英文組：外國文（含新聞書信撰寫與編譯）（英文）#56576

Translation: Translate the following news report into Chinese, including the title and the passage.（15 分） ABENOMICS: Overhyped, underappreciated In the 1980s Japan was a closely studied example of economic dynamism. In the decades since, it has commanded attention largely for its economic stagnation. After years of falling prices and fitful growth, Japan’s nominal GDP was roughly the same in 2015 as it was 20 years earlier. America’s grew by 134% in the same time period; even Italy’s went up by two-thirds. Now Japan is in the spotlight for a different reason: its attempts at economic resuscitation. To reflate Japan and reform it, Shinzo Abe, prime minister since December 2012, proposed the three “arrows” of what has become known as Abenomics: monetary stimulus, fiscal “flexibility” and structural reform. However, it has not only demonstrated how self-defeating fiscal austerity can be, particularly when it comes in the form of a tax on all consumers. Moreover, Abenomics has fallen short of its targets and its overblown rhetoric. That makes it easy to dismiss as a failure. In fact, it has shown that central banks and governments do have the capacity to stir a torpid economy. And in some senses, the hype was needed. Japan’s stagnation had become a self-fulfilling prophecy; Abenomics could succeed only if enough people believed it would. This is a final lesson that Japan’s economic experiment can impart to the rest of the world. Aim high.

 仇恨言論及其管制：歐洲人權法案判例分析 根據歐洲人權法院判決，關於何謂仇恨言論及應否與如何限制等議題，宜同時 從以下五個領域探討：政治爭議、宗教衝突、種族爭論、國家認同、性別特性等。 歐洲人權法院沒有給予仇恨言論明確的定義，然而判例指出納粹、法西斯、反猶太 人、極端言論、排除穆斯林或特定族群、以種族為基礎的威脅、訴諸暴力等，皆構 成仇恨言論。符合歐洲人權公約第 17 條關於禁止權力濫用的適用範圍。再者，法院 曾判決，對於構成具體威脅的仇恨言論可加諸預防性措施，而訴諸暴力的言論也可 以被禁止。學者和外交人士指出，歐洲人權法院不需要針對仇恨言論先劃定「禁區」， 也無需強調歐洲人權法案第 17 條的適用。而可以透過該公約第 10 條第 2 項及第 11 條第 2 項，來審查這些針對言論自由及集會結社自由的限制，是否有違比例原則。