23. Which of the following sentences is structurally-ambiguous?
(A) The florist sent the flowers was pleased.
(B) We need more efficient equipment.
(C) Look at the spring.
(D) The woman has quit smoking.

答案：登入後查看
統計： A(155), B(295), C(72), D(23), E(0) #2307622

詳解 (共 5 筆)

#5390855

We need more efficient equipment. 

(1) 我們需要更多有效率的裝備

(2) 我們需要更有效率的裝備

19
0
#5795186
We need more efficie...
(共 99 字，隱藏中）
前往觀看
10
0
#4050415
Interpretation 1: We...
(共 173 字，隱藏中）
前往觀看
10
1
#4544702

In English grammar, syntactic ambiguity (also called structural ambiguity or grammatical ambiguity) is the presence of two or more possible meanings within a single sentence or sequence of words, as opposed to lexical ambiguity, which is the presence of two or more possible meanings within a single word. The intended meaning of a syntactically ambiguous phrase can generally—although not always—be determined by the context of its use.

equipment (n.) the set of necessary tools, clothing, etc. for a particular purpose

在選項裡的equipment沒辦法清楚表達是什麼樣的設備或裝備

5
1
#3988325

ambiguous：含糊不清的；引起歧義的，模棱兩可的；不明確的。　

We need more efficient equipment.

我們需要有效率的設備

沒效率的設備會有人需要嗎？

原本的是沒有效率的？

需要什麼設備？

意圖不明確．．．



2
3